Speaking on the 3rd Moroccan Crisis
Personally I am a sincere advocate of all means which
would lead to the settlement of international disputes by methods such as those
which civilization has so successfully set up for the adjustment of differences
between individuals, and I rejoice in my heart at the prospect of a happy issue
to Sir Edward Grey's negotiations with the United States of America for the
settlement of disputes which may occur in future between ourselves and our
kinsmen across the Atlantic by some more merciful, more rational, and by a more
just arbitrament than that of the sword.
But I am also bound to say this--that I believe it is essential in the
highest interests, not merely of this country, but of the world, that Britain
should at all hazards maintain her place and her prestige amongst the Great
Powers of the world. Her potent influence has many a time been in the past, and
may yet be in the future, invaluable to the cause of human liberty. It has more
than once in the past redeemed Continental nations, who are sometimes too apt to
forget that service, from overwhelming disaster and even from national
extinction. I would make great sacrifices to preserve peace. I conceive that
nothing would justify a disturbance of international good will except questions
of the greatest national moment. But if a situation were to be forced upon us in
which peace could only be preserved by the surrender of the great and beneficent
position Britain has won by centuries of heroism and achievement, by allowing
Britain to be treated where her interests were vitally affected as if she were
of no account in the Cabinet of nations, then I say emphatically that peace at
that price would be a humiliation intolerable for a great country like ours to
endure.
From The Times, London, July 22, 1911.
|
|