Emerson's Harvard commencement address delivered to the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Harvard in 1837
Commencement speeches are customarily routine, pedantic, mildly inspiring lectures filled with platitudes. " The American Scholar ", - a celebrated
commencement address delivered by Ralph Waldo Emerson to the Phi Beta Kappa Society at Harvard in 1837 defied
such pedestrian description. Oliver Wendell Holmes called this speech America's
" Intellectual Declaration of Independence " In addition to being a
call for literary independence from Europe, and from past traditions, the speech
set out Emerson's blueprint for how aware humans should live their lives.
MR. PRESIDENT AND GENTLEMEN: I
greet you on the recommencement of our literary year. Our anniversary is
one of hope, and, perhaps, not enough of labor. We do not meet for games
of strength or skill, for the recitation of histories, tragedies, and
odes, like the ancient Greeks; for parliaments of love and poesy, like the
Troubadours; nor for the advancement of science, like our contemporaries
in the British and European capitals. Thus far our holiday has been simply
a friendly sign of the survival of the love of letters amongst a people
too busy to give to letters any more. As such, it is precious as the sign
of an indestructible instinct. Perhaps the time is already come when it
ought to be, and will be, something else; when the sluggard intellect of
this continent will look from under its iron lids, and fill the postponed
expectation of the world with something better than the exertions of
mechanical skill. Our day of dependence, our long apprenticeship to the
learning of other lands, draws to a close. The millions that around us are
rushing into life cannot always be fed on the sere remains of foreign
harvests. Events, actions arise, that must be sung, that will sing
themselves. Who can doubt that poetry will revive and lead in a new age,
as the star in the constellation Harp, which now flames in our zenith,
astronomers announce, shall one day be the pole-star for a thousand years?
In this hope I accept the topic which not only usage, but the nature
of our association, seem to prescribe to this day - the AMERICAN SCHOLAR.
Year by year we come up hither to read one more chapter of his biography.
Let us inquire what light new days and events have thrown on his character
and his hopes.
It is one of those fables which, out of an unknown
antiquity, convey an unlooked-for wisdom, that the gods, in the beginning,
divided Man into men, that he might be more helpful to himself; just as
the hand was divided into fingers, the better to answer its end.
The
old fable covers a doctrine ever new and sublime; that there is One
Man, - present to all particular men only partially, or through one faculty;
and that you must take the whole society to find the whole man. Man is not
a farmer, or a professor, or an engineer, but he is all. Man is priest,
and scholar, and statesman, and producer, and soldier. In the divided or
social state these functions are parcelled out to individuals, each of
whom aims to do his stint of the joint work, whilst each other performs
his. The fable implies that the individual, to possess himself, must
sometimes return from his own labor to embrace all the other laborers.
But, unfortunately, this original unit, this fountain of power, has been
so distributed to multitudes, has been so minutely subdivided and peddled
out, that it is spilled into drops and cannot be gathered. The state of
society is one in which the members have suffered amputation from the
trunk, and strut about so many walking monsters - a good finger, a neck, a
stomach, an elbow, but never a man.
Man is thus metamorphosed into a
thing, into many things. The planter, who is Man sent out into the field
to gather food, is seldom cheered by any idea of the true dignity of his
ministry. He sees his bushel and his cart, and nothing beyond, and sinks
into the farmer, instead of Man on the farm. The tradesman scarcely ever
gives an ideal worth to his work, but is ridden by the routine of his
craft, and the soul is subject to dollars. The priest becomes a form; the
attorney, a statute-book; the mechanic, a machine; the sailor, a rope of a
ship.
In this distribution of functions the scholar is the delegated
intellect. In the right state, he is Man Thinking. In the degenerate
state, when the victim of society, he tends to become a mere thinker, or,
still worse, the parrot of other men’s thinking.
In this view of
him, as Man Thinking, the theory of his office is contained. Him Nature
solicits with all her placid, all her monitory pictures; him the past
instructs; him the future invites. Is not, indeed, every man a student,
and do not all things exist for the student’s behoof? And, finally, is not
the true scholar the only true master? But the old oracle said, “All
things have two handles: beware of the wrong one.” In life, too often the
scholar errs with mankind and forfeits his privilege. Let us see him in
his school, and consider him in reference to the main influences he
receives.
I. The first in time and the first in importance of
the influences upon the mind is that of Nature. Every day, the sun; and,
after sunset, Night and her stars. Ever the winds blow; ever the grass
grows. Every day, men and women, conversing, beholding and beholden. The
scholar is he of all men whom this spectacle most engages. He must settle
its value in his mind. What is Nature to him? There is never a beginning,
there is never an end, to the inexplicable continuity of this web of God,
but always circular power returning into itself. Therein it resembles his
own spirit, whose beginning, whose ending, he never can find, - so entire,
so boundless. Far, too, as her splendors shine, system on system shooting
like rays upward, downward, without centre, without circumference, - in the
mass and in the particle, Nature hastens to render account of herself to
the mind. Classification begins. To the young mind, everything is
individual, stands by itself. By and by it finds how to join two things,
and see in them one nature; then three, then three thousand; and so
tyrannized over by its own unifying instinct, it goes on tying things
together, diminishing anomalies, discovering roots running under ground,
whereby contrary and remote things cohere, and flower out from one stem.
It presently learns that since the dawn of history there has been a
constant accumulation and classifying of facts. But what is classification
but the perceiving that these objects are not chaotic, and are not
foreign, but have a law which is also a law of the human mind? The
astronomer discovers that geometry, a pure abstraction of the human mind,
is the measure of planetary motion. The chemist finds proportions and
intelligible method throughout matter; and science is nothing but the
finding of analogy, identity, in the most remote parts. The ambitious soul
sits down before each refractory fact; one after another reduces all
strange constitutions, all new powers, to their class and their law, and
goes on forever to animate the last fibre of organization, the outskirts
of nature, by insight.
Thus to him, to this school-boy under the
bending dome of day, is suggested that he and it proceed from one root;
one is leaf and one is flower; relation, sympathy, stirring in every vein.
And what is that Root? Is not that the soul of his soul? A thought too
bold, a dream too wild. Yet when this spiritual light shall have revealed
the law of more earthly natures, when he has learned to worship the soul,
and to see that the natural philosophy that now is, is only the first
gropings of its gigantic hand, he shall look forward to an ever-expanding
knowledge as to a becoming creator. He shall see that Nature is the
opposite of the soul, answering to it part for part. One is seal and one
is print. Its beauty is the beauty of his own mind. Its laws are the laws
of his own mind. Nature then becomes to him the measure of his
attainments. So much of Nature as he is ignorant of, so much of his own
mind does he not yet possess. And, in fine, the ancient precept, “Know
thyself,” and the modern precept, “Study Nature,” become at last one
maxim.
II. The next great influence into the spirit of the
scholar is the mind of the Past - in whatever form, whether of literature,
of art, of institutions, that mind is inscribed. Books are the best type
of the influence of the past, and perhaps we shall get at the truth - learn
the amount of this influence more conveniently - by considering their value
alone.
The theory of books is noble. The scholar of the first age
received into him the world around; brooded thereon; gave it the new
arrangement of his own mind, and uttered it again. It came into him life;
it went out from him truth. It came to him short-lived actions; it went
out from him immortal thoughts. It came to him business; it went from him
poetry. It was dead fact; now it is quick thought. It can stand and it can
go. It now endures, it now flies, it now inspires. Precisely in proportion
to the depth of mind from which it issued, so high does it soar, so long
does it sing.
Or, I might say, it depends on how far the process
had gone of transmuting life into truth. In proportion to the completeness
of the distillation, so will the purity and imperishableness of the
product be. But none is quite perfect. As no air-pump can by any means
make a perfect vacuum, so neither can any artist entirely exclude the
conventional, the local, the perishable from his book, or write a book of
pure thought that shall be as efficient in all respects to a remote
posterity, as to contemporaries, or rather to the second age. Each age, it
is found, must write its own books; or rather, each generation for the
next succeeding. The books of an older period will not fit this.
Yet hence arises a grave mischief. The sacredness which attaches to
the act of creation - the act of thought - is transferred to the record. The
poet chanting was felt to be a divine man: henceforth the chant is divine
also. The writer was a just and wise spirit: hence-forward it is settled,
the book is perfect; as love of the hero corrupts into worship of his
statue. Instantly the book becomes noxious; the guide is a tyrant. The
sluggish and perverted mind of the multitude, slow to open to the
incursions of Reason, having once so opened, having once received this
book, stands upon it and makes an outcry if it is disparaged. Colleges are
built on it. Books are written on it by thinkers, not by Man Thinking; by
men of talent, that is, who start wrong, who set out from accepted dogmas,
not from their own sight of principles. Meek young men grow up in
libraries believing it their duty to accept the views which Cicero, which
Locke, which Bacon have given, forgetful that Cicero, Locke, and Bacon
were only young men in libraries when they wrote these books.
Hence, instead of Man Thinking we have the bookworm. Hence, the
book-learned class who value books as such; not as related to Nature and
the human constitution, but as making a sort of Third Estate with the
world and the soul. Hence, the restorers of readings, the emendators, the
bibliomaniacs of all degrees.
Books are the best of things, well
used; abused, among the worst. What is the right use? What is the one end,
which all means go to effect? They are for nothing but to inspire. I had
better never see a book, than to be warped by its attraction clean out of
my own orbit, and made a satellite instead of a system. The one thing in
the world, of value, is the active soul. This every man is entitled to;
this every man contains within him, although, in almost all men,
obstructed, and as yet unborn. The soul active sees absolute truth; and
utters truth, or creates. In this action it is genius; not the privilege
of here and there a favorite, but the sound estate of every man. In its
essence it is progressive. The book, the college, the school or art, the
institution of any kind, stop with some past utterance of genius. This is
good, say they, - let us hold by this. They pin me down. They look backward
and not forward. But genius looks forward; the eyes of man are set in his
forehead, not in his hindhead; man hopes; genius creates. Whatever talents
may be, if the man create not, the pure efflux of the Deity is not his;
cinders and smoke there may be, but not yet flame. There are creative
manners, there are creative actions, and creative words; manners, actions,
words, that is, indicative of no custom or authority, but springing
spontaneous from the mind’s own sense of good and fair.
On the
other part, instead of being its own seer, let is receive from another
mind its truth, though it were in torrents of light, without periods of
solitude, inquest, and self-recovery, and a fatal disservice is done.
Genius is always sufficiently the enemy of genius by over-influence. The
literature of every nation bears me witness. The English dramatic poets
have Shakespearized now for two hundred years.
Undoubtedly there is
a right way of reading, so it be sternly subordinated. Man Thinking must
not be subdued by his instruments. Books are for the scholar’s idle times.
When we can read God directly, the hour is too precious to be wasted in
other men’s transcripts of their readings. But when the intervals of
darkness come, as come they must, - when the sun is hid, and the stars
withdraw their shining, - we repair to the lamps which were kindled by their
ray, to guide our steps to the East again, where the dawn is. We hear,
that we may speak. The Arabian proverb says, “A fig-tree, looking on a
fig-tree, becometh fruitful.”
It is remarkable, the character of
the pleasure we derive from the best books. They impress us with the
conviction that one nature wrote and the same reads. We read the verses of
one of the great English poets, of Chaucer, of Marvell, of Dryden, with
the most modern joy, - with a pleasure, I mean, which is in great part
caused by the abstraction of all time from their verses. There is some awe
mixed with the joy of our surprise when this poet, who lived in some past
world two or three hundred years ago, says that which lies close to my own
soul, that which I also had well-nigh thought and said. But for the
evidence thence afforded to the philosophical doctrine of the identity of
all minds, we should suppose some preëstablished harmony, some foresight
of souls that were to be, and some preparation of stores for their future
wants, like the fact observed in insects, who lay up food before death for
the young grub they shall never see.
I would not be hurried by any
love of system, by any exaggeration of instincts, to underrate the Book.
We all know that as the human body can be nourished on any food, though it
were boiled grass and the broth of shoes, so the human mind can be fed by
any knowledge. And great and heroic men have existed who had almost no
other information than by the printed page. I only would say, that it
needs a strong head to bear that diet. One must be an inventor to read
well. As the proverb says, “He that would bring home the wealth of the
Indies, must carry out the wealth of the Indies.” There is then creative
reading as well as creative writing. When the mind is braced by labor and
invention, the page of whatever book we read becomes luminous with
manifold allusion. Every sentence is doubly significant, and the sense of
our author is as broad as the world. We then see, what is always true,
that, as the seer’s hour of vision is short and rare among heavy days and
months, so is its record, perchance, the least part of his volume. The
discerning will read, in his Plato or Shakespeare, only that least
part, - only the authentic utterances of the oracle; all the rest he
rejects, were it never so many times Plato’s and Shakespeare’s.
Of
course, there is a portion of reading quite indispensable to a wise man.
History and exact science he must learn by laborious reading. Colleges, in
like manner, have their indispensable office, - to teach elements. But they
can only highly serve us when they aim not to drill, but to create; when
they gather from far every ray of various genius to their hospitable
halls, and, by the concentrated fires, set the hearts of their youth on
flame. Thought and knowledge are natures in which apparatus and pretension
avail nothing. Gowns, and pecuniary foundations, though of towns of gold,
can never countervail the least sentence or syllable of wit. Forget this,
and our American colleges will recede in their public importance, whilst
they grow richer every year.
III. There goes in the world a
notion that the scholar should be a recluse, a valetudinarian, - as unfit
for any handiwork or public labor, as a pen-knife for an axe. The
so-called “practical men” sneer at speculative men, as if, because they
speculate or see, they could do nothing. I have heard it said that the
clergy - who are always, more universally than any other class, the scholars
of their day - are addressed as women; that the rough, spontaneous
conversation of men they do not hear, but only a mincing and diluted
speech. They are often virtually disenfranchised; and, indeed, there are
advocates for their celibacy. As far as this is true of the studious
classes, it is not just and wise. Action is with the scholar subordinate,
but it is essential. Without it, he is not yet man. Without it, thought
can never ripen into truth. Whilst the world hangs before the eye as a
cloud of beauty, we cannot even see its beauty. Inaction is cowardice, but
there can be no scholar without the heroic mind. The preamble of thought,
the transition through which it passes from the unconscious to the
conscious, is action. Only so much do I know, as I have lived. Instantly
we know whose words are loaded with life, and whose not.
The
world - this shadow of the soul, or other me - lies wide around. Its
attractions are the keys which unlock my thoughts and make me acquainted
with myself. I run eagerly into this resounding tumult. I grasp the hands
of those next me, and take my place in the ring to suffer and to work,
taught by an instinct, that so shall the dumb abyss be vocal with speech.
I pierce its order; I dissipate its fear; I dispose of it within the
circuit of my expanding life. So much only of life as I know by
experience, so much of the wilderness have I vanquished and planted, or so
far have I extended my being, my dominion. I do not see how any man can
afford, for the sake of his nerves and his nap, to spare any action in
which he can partake. It is pearls and rubies to his discourse. Drudgery,
calamity, exasperation, want, are instructors in eloquence and wisdom. The
true scholar grudges every opportunity of action passed by, as a loss of
power.
It is the raw material out of which the intellect moulds her
splendid products. A strange process too, this, by which experience is
converted into thought, as a mulberry leaf is converted into satin. The
manufacture goes forward at all hours.
The actions and events of
our childhood and youth are now matters of calmest observation. They lie
like fair pictures in the air. Not so with our recent actions, - with the
business which we now have in hand. On this we are quite unable to
speculate. Our affections as yet circulate through it. We no more feel or
know it, than we feel the feet, or the hand, or the brain of our body. The
new deed is yet a part of life, - remains for a time immersed in our
unconscious life. In some contemplative hour it detaches itself from the
life like a ripe fruit, to become a thought of the mind. Instantly it is
raised, transfigured; the corruptible has put on incorruption. Henceforth
it is an object of beauty, however base its origin and neighborhood.
Observe, too, the impossibility of antedating this act. In its grub state,
it cannot fly, it cannot shine, it is a dull grub. But suddenly, without
observation, the selfsame thing unfurls beautiful wings, and is an angel
of wisdom. So is there no fact, no event, in our private history which
shall not, sooner or later, lose its adhesive, inert form, and astonish us
by soaring from our body into the empyrean. Cradle and infancy, school and
playground, the fear of boys, and dogs, and ferules, the love of little
maids and berries, and many other fact that once filled the whole sky, are
gone already; friend and relative, profession and party, town and country,
nation and world, must also soar and sing.
Of course, he who has
put forth his total strength in fit actions has the richest return of
wisdom. I will not shut myself out of this globe of action, and transplant
an oak into a flower-pot, there to hunger and pine; nor trust the revenue
of some single faculty, and exhaust one vein of thought, much like those
Savoyards, who, getting their livelihood by carving shepherds,
shepherdesses, and smoking Dutchmen for all Europe, went out one day to
the mountain to find stock, and discovered that they had whittled up the
last of their pine-trees. Authors we have in numbers who have written out
their vein, and who, moved by a commendable prudence, sail for Greece or
Palestine, follow the trapper into the prairie, or ramble round Algiers,
to replenish their merchantable stock.
If it were only for a
vocabulary, the scholar would be convetous of action. Life is our
dictionary. Years are well spent in country labors; in town, in the
insight into trades and manufactures; in frank intercourse with many men
and women; in science; in art, - to the one end of mastering in all their
facts a language by which to illustrate and embody our perceptions. I
learn immediately from any speaker how much he has already lived, through
the poverty or the splendor of his speech. Life lies behind us as the
quarry from whence we get tiles and cope-stones for the masonry of to-day.
This is the way to learn grammar. Colleges and books only copy the
language which the field and the workyard made.
But the final value
of action, like that of books, and better than books, is, that it is a
resource. That great principle of Undulation in nature, that shows itself
in the inspiring and expiring of the breath; in desire and satiety; in the
ebb and flow of the sea; in day and night; in heat and cold; and as yet
more deeply ingrained in every atom and every fluid, is known to us under
the name of Polarity, - these “fits of easy transmission and reflection,” as
Newton called them, are the law of Nature because they are the law of
spirit.
The mind now thinks, now acts; and each fit reproduces the
other. When the artist has exhausted his materials, when the fancy no
longer paints, when thoughts are no longer apprehended, and books are a
weariness, - he has always the resource to live. Character is higher than
intellect. Thinking is the function. Living is the functionary. The stream
retreats to its source. A great soul will be strong to live, as well as
strong to think. Does he lack organ or medium to impart his truths? He can
still fall back on this elemental force of living them. This is a total
act. Thinking is a partial act. Let the grandeur of justice shine in his
affairs. Let the beauty of affection cheer his lowly roof. Those “far from
fame,” who dwell and act with him, will feel the force of his constitution
in the doings and passages of the day better than it can be measured by
any public and designed display. Time shall teach him that the scholar
loses no hour which the man lives. Herein he unfolds the sacred germ of
his instinct, screened from influence. What is lost in seemliness is
gained in strength. Not out of those, on whom systems of education have
exhausted their culture, comes the helpful giant to destroy the old or to
build the new, but out of unhandselled savage nature, out of terrible
Druids and berserkirs, come at last Alfred and Shakespeare.
I hear,
therefore, with joy whatever is beginning to be said of the dignity and
necessity of labor to every citizen. There is virtue yet in the hoe and
the spade, for learned as well as for unlearned hands. And labor is
everywhere welcome; always we are invited to work; only be this limitation
observed, that a man shall not for the sake of wider activity sacrifice
any opinion to the popular judgments and modes of action.
I
have now spoken of the education of the scholar by Nature, by books, and
by action. It remains to say somewhat of his duties.
They are such
as become Man Thinking. They may all be comprised in self-trust. The
office of the scholar is to cheer, to raise, and to guide men by showing
them facts amidst appearances. He plies the slow, unhonored, and unpaid
task of observation. Flamsteed and Herschel, in their glazed
observatories, may catalogue the stars with the praise of all men, and,
the results being splendid and useful, honor is sure. But he, in his
private observatory, cataloguing obscure and nebulous stars of the human
mind, which as yet no man has thought of as such, - watching days and
months, sometimes, for a few facts; correcting still his old records, - must
relinquish display and immediate fame. In the long period of his
preparation he must betray often an ignorance and shiftlessness in popular
arts, incurring the disdain of the able, who shoulder him aside. Long he
must stammer in his speech; often forego the living for the dead. Worse
yet, he must accept - how often! - poverty and solitude. For the ease and
pleasure of treading the old road, accepting the fashions, the education,
the religion of society, he takes the cross of making his own, and, of
course, the self-accusation, the faint heart, the frequent uncertainty and
loss of time, which are the nettles and tangling vines in the way of the
self-relying and self-directed; and the state of virtual hostility in
which he seems to stand to society, and especially to educated society.
For all this loss and scorn, what off-set? He is to find consolation in
exercising the highest functions of human nature. He is one who raises
himself from private considerations, and breathes and lives on public and
illustrious thoughts. He is the world’s eye. He is the world’s heart. He
is to resist the vulgar prosperity that retrogrades ever to barbarism, by
preserving and communicating heroic sentiments, noble biographies,
melodious verse, and the conclusions of history. Whatsoever oracles the
human heart, in all emergencies, in all solemn hours, has uttered as its
commentary on the world of actions, - these he shall receive and impart. And
whatsoever new verdict Reason from her inviolable seat pronounces on the
passing men and events of to-day, - this he shall hear and promulgate.
These being his functions, it becomes him to feel all confidence in
himself, and to defer never to the popular cry. He and he only knows the
world. The world of any moment is the merest appearance. Some great
decorum, some fetish of a government, some ephemeral trade, or war, or
man, is cried up by half mankind and cried down by the other half, as if
all depended on this particular up or down. The odds are that the whole
question is not worth the poorest thought which the scholar has lost in
listening to the controversy. Let him not quit his belief that a popgun is
a popgun, though the ancient and honorable of the earth affirm it to be
the crack of doom. In silence, in steadiness, in severe abstraction, let
him hold by himself; add observation to observation, patient of neglect,
patient of reproach; and bide his own time, - happy enough if he can satisfy
himself alone, that this day he has seen something truly. Success treads
on every right step. For the instinct is sure that prompts him to tell his
brother what he thinks. He then learns that in going down into the secrets
of his own mind he has descended into the secrets of all minds. He learns
that he who has mastered any law in his private thoughts is master to that
extent of all men whose language he speaks, and of all into whose language
his own can be translated. The poet, in utter solitude remembering his
spontaneous thoughts and recording them, is found to have recorded that
which men in crowded cities find true for them also. The orator distrusts
at first the fitness of his frank confessions, - his want of knowledge of
the persons he addresses, - until he finds that he is the complement of his
hearers; that they drink his words because he fulfils for them their own
nature; the deeper he dives into his privatest, secretest presentiment, to
his wonder he finds this is the most acceptable, most public, and
universally true. The people delight in it; the better part of every man
feels, This is my music; this is myself.
In self-trust all the
virtues are comprehended. Free should the scholar be, - free and brave. Free
even to the definition of freedom, “without any hindrance that does not
arise out of his own constitution.” Brave; for fear is a thing which a
scholar by his very function puts behind him. Fear always springs from
ignorance. It is a shame to him if his tranquility, amid dangerous times,
arise from the presumption that, like children and women, his is a
protected class; or if he seek a temporary peace by the diversion of his
thoughts from politics or vexed questions, hiding his head like an ostrich
in the flowering bushes, peeping into microscopes, and turning rhymes, as
a boy whistles to keep his courage up. So is the danger a danger still; so
is the fear worse. Manlike let him turn and face it. Let him look into its
eye and search its nature, inspect its origin, - see the whelping of this
lion, which lies no great way back; he will then find in himself a perfect
comprehension of its nature and extent; he will have made his hands meet
on the other side, and can henceforth defy it, and pass on superior. The
world is his, who can see through its pretension. What deafness, what
stone-blind custom, what overgrown error you behold, is there only by
sufferance, - by your sufferance. See it to be a lie, and you have already
dealt it its mortal blow.
Yes, we are the cowed - we the trustless.
It is a mischievous notion that we are come late into Nature; that the
world was finished a long time ago. As the world was plastic and fluid in
the hands of God, so it is ever to so much of his attributes as we bring
to it. To ignorance and sin, it is flint. They adapt themselves to it as
they may; but in proportion as a man has anything in him divine, the
firmament flows before him and takes his signet and form. Not he is great
who can alter matter, but he who can alter my state of mind. They are the
kings of the world who give the color of their present thought to all
nature and all art, and persuade men by the cheerful serenity of their
carrying the matter, that this thing which they do is the apple which the
ages have desired to pluck, now at last ripe, and inviting nations to the
harvest. The great man makes the great thing. Wherever Macdonald sits,
there is the head of the table. Linnaeus makes botany the most alluring of
studies, and wins it from the farmer and the herb-woman; Davy, chemistry;
and Cuvier, fossils. The day is always his, who works in it with serenity
and great aims. The unstable estimates of men crowd to him whose mind is
filled with a truth, as the heaped waves of the Atlantic follow the moon.
For this self-trust, the reason is deeper than can be fathomed,
darker than can be enlightened. I might not carry with me the feeling of
my audience in stating my own belief. But I have already shown the ground
of my hope, in adverting to the doctrine that man is one. I believe man
has been wronged; he has wronged himself. He has almost lost the light
that can lead him back to his prerogatives. Men are become of no account.
Men in history, men in the world of to-day are bugs, are spawn, and are
called “the mass” and “the herd.” In a century, in a millennium, one or
two men; that is to say, one or two approximations to the right state of
every man. All the rest behold in the hero or the poet their own green and
crude being, - ripened; yes, and are content to be less, so that may attain
to its full stature. What a testimony, full of grandeur, full of pity, is
borne to the demands of his own nature by the poor clansman, the poor
partisan, who rejoices in the glory of his chief. The poor and the low
find some amends to their immense moral capacity for their acquiescence in
a political and social inferiority. They are content to be brushed like
flies from the path of a great person, so that justice shall be done by
him to that common nature which it is the dearest desire of all to see
enlarged and glorified. They sun themselves in the great man’s light, and
feel it to be their own element. They cast the dignity of man from their
downtrod selves upon the shoulders of a hero, and will perish to add one
drop of blood to make that great heart beat, those giant sinews combat and
conquer. He lives for us, and we live in him.
Men such as they are,
very naturally seek money or power; and power because it is as good as
money, - the “spoils,” so called, “of office.” And why not? for they aspire
to the highest, and this, in their sleep-walking, they dream is highest.
Wake them, and they shall quit the false good, and leap to the true, and
leave governments to clerks and desks. This revolution is to be wrought by
the gradual domestication of the idea of Culture. The main enterprise of
the world for splendor, for extent, is the upbuilding of a man. Here are
the materials strewn along the ground. The private life of one man shall
be a more illustrious monarchy, - more formidable to its enemy, more sweet
and serene in its influence to its friend, than any kingdom in history.
For a man, rightly viewed, comprehendeth the particular natures of all
men. Each philosopher, each bard, each actor, has only done for me, as by
a delegate, what one day I can do for myself. The books which once we
valued more than the apple of the eye we have quite exhausted. What is
that but saying that we have come up with the point of view which the
universal mind took through the eyes of one scribe; we have been that man,
and have passed on. First one, then another, we drain all cisterns, and,
waxing greater by all these supplies, we crave a better and more abundant
food. The man has never lived that can feed us ever. The human mind cannot
be enshrined in a person who shall set a barrier on any one side to this
unbounded, unboundable empire. It is one central fire, which, flaming now
out of the lips of Etna, lightens the capes of Sicily; and now out of the
throat of Vesuvius, illuminates the towers and vineyards of Naples. It is
one light which beams out of a thousand stars. It is one soul which
animates all men.
But I have dwelt perhaps tediously upon this
abstraction of the Scholar. I ought not to delay longer to add what I have
to say of nearer reference to the time and to this country.
Historically there is thought to be a difference in the ideas which
predominate over successive epochs, and there are data for marking the
genius of the Classic, of the Romantic, and now of the Reflective or
Philosophical age. With the views I have intimated of the oneness or the
identity of the mind through all individuals, I do not much dwell on these
differences. In fact, I believe each individual passes through all three.
The boy is a Greek; the youth, romantic; the adult, reflective. I deny
not, however, that a revolution in the leading idea may be distinctly
enough traced.
Our age is bewailed as the age of Introversion. Must
that needs be evil? We, it seems, are critical; we are embarrassed with
second thoughts; we cannot enjoy anything for hankering to know whereof
the pleasure consists; we are lined with eyes; we see with our feet the
time is infected with Hamlet’s unhappiness, - “Sicklied o’er with the pale
cast of thought.”
Is it so bad then? Sight is the last thing to be
pitied. Would we be blind? Do we fear lest we should outsee Nature and
God, and drink truth dry? I look upon the discontent of the literary class
as a mere announcement of the fact that they find themselves not in the
state of mind of their fathers, and regret the coming state as untried; as
a boy dreads the water before he has learned that he can swim. If there is
any period one would desire to be born in, is it not the age of
Revolution; when the old and the new stand side by side, and admit of
being compared; when the energies of all men are searched by fear and by
hope; when the historic glories of the old can be compensated by the rich
possibilities of the new era? This time, like all times, is a very good
one, if we but know what to do with it.
I read with joy of the
auspicious signs of the coming days, as they glimmer already through
poetry and art, through philosophy and science, through church and state.
One of these signs is the fact that the same movement which
affected the elevation of what was called the lowest class in the state,
assumed in literature a very marked and as benign an aspect. Instead of
the sublime and beautiful; the near, the low, the common, was explored and
poetized. That which had been negligently trodden under foot by those who
were harnessing and provisioning themselves for long journeys into far
countries, is suddenly found to be richer than all foreign parts. The
literature of the poor, the feelings of the child, the philosophy of the
street, the meaning of household life, are the topics of the time. It is a
great stride. It is a sign, is it not? of new vigor, when the extremities
are made active, when currents of warm life run into the hands and feet. I
ask not for the great, the remote, the romantic; what is doing in Italy or
Arabia; what is Greek art or Provençal minstrelsy; I embrace the common, I
explore and sit at the feet of the familiar, the low. Give me insight into
to-day, and you may have the antique and future worlds. What would we
really know the meaning of? The meal in the firkin, the milk in the pan,
the ballad in the street, the news of the boat, the glance of the eye, the
form and the gait of the body, - show me the ultimate reason of these
matters; show me the sublime presence of the highest spiritual cause
lurking, as always it does lurk, in these suburbs and extremities of
nature; let me see every trifle bristling with the polarity that ranges it
instantly on an eternal law; and the shop, the plough, and the ledger,
referred to the like cause by which light undulates and poets sing; - and
the world lies no longer a dull miscellany and lumber-room, but has form
and order; there is no trifle, there is no puzzle, but one design unites
and animates the farthest pinnacle and the lowest trench.
This idea
has inspired the genius of Goldsmith, Burns, Cowper, and, in a newer time,
of Goethe, Wordsworth, and Carlyle. This idea they have differently
followed and with various success. In contrast with their writing, the
style of Pope, of Johnson, of Gibbon, looks cold and pedantic. This
writing is blood-warm. Man is surprised to find that things near are not
less beautiful and wondrous than things remote. The near explains the far.
The drop is a small ocean. A man is related to all nature. This perception
of the worth of the vulgar is fruitful in discoveries. Goethe, in this
very thing the most modern of the moderns, has shown us, as none ever did,
the genius of the ancients.
There is one man of genius who has done
much for this philosophy of life, whose literary value has never yet been
rightly estimated; I mean Emanuel Swedenborg. The most imaginative of men,
yet writing with the precision of a mathematician, he endeavored to
engraft a purely philosophical Ethics on the popular Christianity of his
time. Such an attempt, of course, must have difficulty which no genius
could surmount. But he saw and showed the connection between nature and
the affections of the soul. He pierced the emblematic or spiritual
character of the visible, audible, tangible world. Especially did his
shade-loving muse hover over and interpret the lower parts of nature; he
showed the mysterious bond that allies moral evil to the foul material
forms, and has given in epical parables a theory of insanity, of beasts,
of unclean and fearful things.
Another sign of our times, also
marked by an analogous political movement, is the new importance given to
the single person. Everything that tends to insulate the individual - to
surround him with barriers of natural respect, so that each man shall feel
the world is his and man shall treat with man as a sovereign state with a
sovereign state - tends to true union as well as greatness. “I learned,”
said the melancholy Pestalozzi, “that no man in God’s wide earth is either
willing or able to help any other man.” Help must come from the bosom
alone. The scholar is that man who must take up into himself all the
ability of the time, all the contributions of the past, all the hopes of
the future. He must be a university of knowledges. If there be one lesson
more than another which should pierce his ear, it is, The world is
nothing, the man is all; in yourself is the law of all nature, and you
know not yet how a globule of sap ascends; in yourself slumbers the whole
of Reason; it is for you to know all, it is for you to dare all. Mr.
President and Gentlemen, this confidence in the unsearched might of man
belongs, by all motives, by all prophecy, by all preparation, to the
American Scholar. We have listened too long to the courtly muses of
Europe. The spirit of the American freeman is already suspected to be
timid, imitative, tame. Public and private avarice make the air we breathe
thick and fat. The scholar is decent, indolent, complaisant. See already
the tragic consequence. The mind of this country, taught to aim at low
objects, eats upon itself. There is no work for any but the decorous and
the complaisant. Young men of the fairest promise, who begin life upon our
shores, inflated by the mountain winds, shined upon by all the stars of
God, find the earth below not in unison with these, but are hindered from
action by the disgust which the principles on which business is managed
inspire, and turn drudges or die of disgust - some of them suicides. What is
the remedy? They did not yet see, and thousands of young men as hopeful
now crowding to the barriers for the career do not yet see, that if the
single man plant himself indomitably on his instincts, and there abide,
the huge world will come round to him. Patience, patience; with the shades
of all the good and great for company; and for solace, the perspective of
your own infinite life; and for work, the study and the communication of
principles, the making those instincts prevalent, the conversion of the
world. Is it not the chief disgrace in the world not to be a unit, not to
be reckoned one character, not to yield that peculiar fruit; which each
man was created to bear; but to be reckoned in the gross, in the hundred,
or the thousand, of the party, the section, to which we belong; and our
opinion predicted geographically, as the north, or the south? Not so,
brothers and friends, - please God, ours shall not be so. We will walk on
our own feet; we will work with our own hands; we will speak our own
minds. The study of letters shall be no longer a name for pity, for doubt,
and for sensual indulgence. The dread of man and the love of man shall be
a wall of defence and a wreath of joy around all. A nation of men will for
the first time exist, because each believes himself inspired by the Divine
Soul which also inspires all men.
Links to Particularly Popular Topics & Pages