Social Construction of Reality
[social construction]
human nature

Home > Social Construction of Reality

  Site Map  |  * Popular Pages *  |  Slide Shows  |  Guest Book  |  Links  |  About Us  |  Download Wisdoms  | 


The Social Construction of Reality


"Mankind are so much the same, in all times and places, that history informs us of nothing new or strange in this particular. Its chief use is only to discover the constant and universal principles of human nature."
David Hume


You can find key insights, (from the Great Faiths, Plato, Socrates, Pythagoras, and Shakespeare!!!),
on several of our pages that give convincing support to this view of Human Nature!!!


"...man is a bundle of relations, a knot of roots,
whose flower and fruitage is the world..."

Ralph Waldo Emerson


"Whatever concept one may hold, from a metaphysical point of view, concerning the freedom of the will, certainly its appearances, which are human actions, like every other natural event, are determined by universal laws. However obscure their causes, history, which is concerned with narrating these appearances, permits us to hope that if we attend to the play of freedom of the human will in the large, we may be able to discern a regular movement in it, and that what seems complex and chaotic in the single individual may be seen from the standpoint of the human race as a whole to be a steady and progressive though slow evolution of its original endowment."
Immanuel Kant
Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View (1784)

Or to quote Emerson, from his famous Essay ~ History more fully:-

"In old Rome the public roads beginning at the Forum proceeded north, south, east, west, to the centre of every province of the empire, making each market-town of Persia, Spain, and Britain pervious to the soldiers of the capital: so out of the human heart go, as it were, highways to the heart of every object in nature, to reduce it under the dominion of man. A man is a bundle of relations, a knot of roots, whose flower and fruitage is the world. His faculties refer to natures out of him, and predict the world he is to inhabit, as the fins of the fish foreshow that water exists, or the wings of an eagle in the egg presuppose air. He cannot live without a world."

 
  "There is one mind common to all individual men....
....Of the works of this mind history is the record. Man is explicable by nothing less than all his history. All the facts of history pre-exist as laws. Each law in turn is made by circumstances predominant. The creation of a thousand forests is in one acorn, and Egypt, Greece, Rome, Gaul, Britain, America, lie folded already in the first man. Epoch after epoch, camp, kingdom, empire, republic, democracy, are merely the application of this manifold spirit to the manifold world."

From Ralph Waldo Emerson's Essay ~ History

Please recommend this page to any of your friends who might be interested!!!

 

 
  
We have prepared some fairly meaty, but hopefully entertaining, pages about a most informative episode in European History in the spirit of attempting to learn worthwhile lessons of history!!!
 

  The European Revolutions of 1848


 

Our view of reality may not be entirely, or even mainly, "Rational" but may rather be a Human / Social Construction of Reality that is itself based on the promptings and cues provided by innate Human Nature.



Early peoples probably lived in tribes rather than in "Open" societies.

[]


Tribal Existence?

[Social Psychology]



Intergroup Discrimination


It seems that also arising out of our tribal past there is a tendency to favour our "own" group and to discriminate against "out" groups. This tendency towards Intergroup Discrimation would presumably have given the in-group some advantage in survival terms.



[]


Intergroup Discrimination?

[Social Construction of Reality]



The Unfolding of History

As members of tribes across historic time individual human beings may have needed inherent functionality that would allow the tribe to be internally harmonious (spirituality), self-regenerating (desire), and self preserving (manhood).

Over time tribes became larger and fell under the sway of Kings, Emperors and Churchmen. Dynastic marriages amongst "God's Anointed" dynastic houses (and also conflicts and the seeking of protection by peoples who felt themselves to be threatened) commonly lead to the inclusion of peoples from diverse ethnic traditions under the same dynastic ruler. In theory King and Emperors sought to exercise their sovereign powers justly under God and were charged with seeking to promote the welfare of their subjects.

As societies became more sophisticated, educated, and wealthy there were "Liberalistic" demands made by the rising middle classes for a share of influence over policy. This Liberalism enjoyed a heyday in Western Europe over several decades before and after 1800 but was increasingly displaced in political significance by such forces as Nationalism and Socialism.

As notions of Sovereignty moved away from accepting that God's anointed rulers were Sovereign and towards an acceptance that Peoples should be Sovereign there was scope for turbulence as communities and peoples were called upon to reflect upon their position on the Earth. The pan-national "Classical" perspectives of the European Enlightenment were increasingly displaced by more particularist "Romantic" perspectives.

Perhaps the most revealing phase of this whole interplay between monarchical Europe, the more longstanding claims of Liberal constitutionalism and the emergent claims of nationalism and socialism was played out in the revolutions of 1848-9. The early phase of this revolution where traditional monarchical rule was variously challenged has been depicted by some as a "springtime of the nations."



[]


The Revolution of 1848

[]



Although monarchical Europe was largely re-established after this period of revolution it was tested across subsequent decades by a number of powerful nationalistic movements. That being said there were two notable instances of Dynastic houses supporting policies whereby national sentiment was exploited in achieving extensions of their realms. These instances being that of Sardinia-Piedmont (Cavour) and Prussia (Bismarck).



[]


Cavour, Garibaldi and
and the Unification of Italy
Bismarck, Prussia and
the Second German Empire

[]



The shift in sentiment away from Monarchical Sovereignty towards Popular Sovereignty was fraught with consequences. Where several communities had lived in relative harmony under the pre-existing monarchical sovereignty there was scope for dire disputations arising out of divergent identifications with emergent sovereign nations. Whilst a monarchical state may have been somewhat, and possibly reluctantly, prepared to function as an "Open" society it often happened that peoples who had been variously brought into association with Kingdoms and Empires aspired to seek to establish themselves in political independence.

Possibly the most dramatic adaption towards Popular Sovereignty occured in association with the settlement to the First World War. The diplomacy of that agonised period featured a serious battle for hearts and minds. Lenin and the American President Wilson both tending to champion the "self-determination of peoples." (This war itself having largely originated out of the aspirations and fears of states and peoples about their "place in the World.")



[]


Origins
First World War
Diplomacy
First World War

[]



Human history has featured many instances of turmoil and injustice in the past and, if Peace on Earth between People of Goodwill is to be our goal, we may ask whether this goal may be better achieved in the future if we attempt to facilitate ALL the majorities and minorities of the Earth in enjoying the basic forms of Felicity. There is a general acceptance in today's world that minorities should be protected and accommodated rather than persecuted and assimilated.

We would suggest that it is in "Open" societies that the Peoples of the Earth may hope to very largely experience the several main types of Felicity for themselves without effectively denying them to any minorities that may be domiciled within their frontiers.

Several communities could perhaps co-exist together in mutual respect and consideration in "Open" societies wheras in "National" or "Confessional" states minority peoples could well feel themselves to be disvalued or excluded.


[]


Human Nature? An Open Society?

[]



Introductory quotations
.
Spirituality
& the wider world
.
Some
Social Theory
speculations
.
Emerson's "Transcendental" approach to History
.
The Social Construction of Reality
.
The Unfolding of History
.
The Vienna Declaration
.
Framework Convention on National minorities



 
 

Start of
Social Construction of Reality