Ralph Waldo Emerson essay History
Essays ~ first series, 1841
Ralph Waldo Emerson resigned as an Unitarian
minister in 1832 and subsequently tried to establish himself as a
lecturer and writer. His efforts in this direction included the
self-financed publication of a pamphlet entitled "Nature" in
1836. This essay, only five hundred copies of which were printed
(and these took some six years to be distributed), received
little initial notice but effectively articulated the
philosophical underpinnings of the subsequently widely
influential New England Transcendentalism movement.
Emerson's first substantial publication was a volume of Essays
that issued, privately funded by Emerson and some of his friends, from the presses in 1841. There were twelve essays in
this volume the very first being one entitled - History.
ESSAY I - History
There is no great and no small
To the Soul that maketh all:
And where it cometh, all things are;
And it cometh everywhere.
I am owner of the sphere,
Of the seven stars and the solar year,
Of Caesar's hand, and Plato's brain,
Of Lord Christ's heart, and Shakspeare's strain.
There is one mind common to all individual men. Every man is
an inlet to the same and to all of the same. He that is once
admitted to the right of reason is made a freeman of the whole
estate. What Plato has thought, he may think; what a saint has
felt, he may feel; what at any time has be-fallen any man, he can
understand. Who hath access to this universal mind is a party to
all that is or can be done, for this is the only and sovereign
agent.
Of the works of this mind history is the record. Its genius is
illustrated by the entire series of days. Man is explicable by
nothing less than all his history. Without hurry, without rest,
the human spirit goes forth from the beginning to embody every
faculty, every thought, every emotion, which belongs to it in
appropriate events. But the thought is always prior to the fact;
all the facts of history preexist in the mind as laws. Each law
in turn is made by circumstances predominant, and the limits of
nature give power to but one at a time. A man is the whole
encyclopaedia of facts. The creation of a thousand forests is in
one acorn, and Egypt, Greece, Rome, Gaul, Britain, America, lie
folded already in the first man. Epoch after epoch, camp,
kingdom, empire, republic, democracy, are merely the application
of his manifold spirit to the manifold world.
This human mind wrote history, and this must read it. The
Sphinx must solve her own riddle. If the whole of history is in
one man, it is all to be explained from individual experience.
There is a relation between the hours of our life and the
centuries of time. As the air I breathe is drawn from the great
repositories of nature, as the light on my book is yielded by a
star a hundred millions of miles distant, as the poise of my body
depends on the equilibrium of centrifugal and centripetal forces,
so the hours should be instructed by the ages, and the ages
explained by the hours. Of the universal mind each individual man
is one more incarnation. All its properties consist in him. Each
new fact in his private experience flashes a light on what great
bodies of men have done, and the crises of his life refer to
national crises. Every revolution was first a thought in one
man's mind, and when the same thought occurs to another man, it
is the key to that era. Every reform was once a private opinion,
and when it shall be a private opinion again, it will solve the
problem of the age. The fact narrated must correspond to
something in me to be credible or intelligible. We as we read
must become Greeks, Romans, Turks, priest and king, martyr and
executioner, must fasten these images to some reality in our
secret experience, or we shall learn nothing rightly. What befell
Asdrubal or Caesar Borgia is as much an illustration of the
mind's powers and depravations as what has befallen us. Each new
law and political movement has meaning for you. Stand before each
of its tablets and say, `Under this mask did my Proteus nature
hide itself.' This remedies the defect of our too great nearness
to ourselves. This throws our actions into perspective: and as
crabs, goats, scorpions, the balance, and the waterpot lose their
meanness when hung as signs in the zodiac, so I can see my own
vices without heat in the distant persons of Solomon, Alcibiades,
and Catiline.
It is the universal nature which gives worth to particular men
and things. Human life as containing this is mysterious and
inviolable, and we hedge it round with penalties and laws. All
laws derive hence their ultimate reason; all express more or less
distinctly some command of this supreme, illimitable essence.
Property also holds of the soul, covers great spiritual facts,
and instinctively we at first hold to it with swords and laws,
and wide and complex combinations. The obscure consciousness of
this fact is the light of all our day, the claim of claims; the
plea for education, for justice, for charity, the foundation of
friendship and love, and of the heroism and grandeur which belong
to acts of self-reliance. It is remarkable that involuntarily we
always read as superior beings. Universal history, the poets, the
romancers, do not in their stateliest pictures -- in the
sacerdotal, the imperial palaces, in the triumphs of will or of
genius -- anywhere lose our ear, anywhere make us feel that we
intrude, that this is for better men; but rather is it true, that
in their grandest strokes we feel most at home. All that
Shakspeare says of the king, yonder slip of a boy that reads in
the corner feels to be true of himself. We sympathize in the
great moments of history, in the great discoveries, the great
resistances, the great prosperities of men; -- because there law
was enacted, the sea was searched, the land was found, or the
blow was struck for us, as we ourselves in that place would
have done or applauded.
We have the same interest in condition and character. We honor
the rich, because they have externally the freedom, power, and
grace which we feel to be proper to man, proper to us. So all
that is said of the wise man by Stoic, or oriental or modern
essayist, describes to each reader his own idea, describes his
unattained but attainable self. All literature writes the
character of the wise man. Books, monuments, pictures,
conversation, are portraits in which he finds the lineaments he
is forming. The silent and the eloquent praise him and accost
him, and he is stimulated wherever he moves as by personal
allusions. A true aspirant, therefore, never needs look for
allusions personal and laudatory in discourse. He hears the
commendation, not of himself, but more sweet, of that character
he seeks, in every word that is said concerning character, yea,
further, in every fact and circumstance, -- in the running river
and the rustling corn. Praise is looked, homage tendered, love
flows from mute nature, from the mountains and the lights of the
firmament.
These hints, dropped as it were from sleep and night, let us
use in broad day. The student is to read history actively and not
passively; to esteem his own life the text, and books the
commentary. Thus compelled, the Muse of history will utter
oracles, as never to those who do not respect themselves. I have
no expectation that any man will read history aright, who thinks
that what was done in a remote age, by men whose names have
resounded far, has any deeper sense than what he is doing
to-day.
The world exists for the education of each man. There is no
age or state of society or mode of action in history, to which
there is not somewhat corresponding in his life. Every thing
tends in a wonderful manner to abbreviate itself and yield its
own virtue to him. He should see that he can live all history in
his own person. He must sit solidly at home, and not suffer
himself to be bullied by kings or empires, but know that he is
greater than all the geography and all the government of the
world; he must transfer the point of view from which history is
commonly read, from Rome and Athens and London to himself, and
not deny his conviction that he is the court, and if England or
Egypt have any thing to say to him, he will try the case; if not,
let them for ever be silent. He must attain and maintain that
lofty sight where facts yield their secret sense, and poetry and
annals are alike. The instinct of the mind, the purpose of
nature, betrays itself in the use we make of the signal
narrations of history. Time dissipates to shining ether the solid
angularity of facts. No anchor, no cable, no fences, avail to
keep a fact a fact. Babylon, Troy, Tyre, Palestine, and even
early Rome, are passing already into fiction. The Garden of Eden,
the sun standing still in Gibeon, is poetry thenceforward to all
nations. Who cares what the fact was, when we have made a
constellation of it to hang in heaven an immortal sign? London
and Paris and New York must go the same way. "What is History,"
said Napoleon, "but a fable agreed upon?" This life of ours is
stuck round with Egypt, Greece, Gaul, England, War, Colonization,
Church, Court, and Commerce, as with so many flowers and wild
ornaments grave and gay. I will not make more account of them. I
believe in Eternity. I can find Greece, Asia, Italy, Spain, and
the Islands, -- the genius and creative principle of each and of
all eras in my own mind.
We are always coming up with the emphatic facts of history in
our private experience, and verifying them here. All history
becomes subjective; in other words, there is properly no history;
only biography. Every mind must know the whole lesson for itself,
-- must go over the whole ground. What it does not see, what it
does not live, it will not know. What the former age has
epitomized into a formula or rule for manipular convenience, it
will lose all the good of verifying for itself, by means of the
wall of that rule. Somewhere, sometime, it will demand and find
compensation for that loss by doing the work itself. Ferguson
discovered many things in astronomy which had long been known.
The better for him.
History must be this or it is nothing. Every law which the
state enacts indicates a fact in human nature; that is all. We
must in ourselves see the necessary reason of every fact, -- see
how it could and must be. So stand before every public and
private work; before an oration of Burke, before a victory of
Napoleon, before a martyrdom of Sir Thomas More, of Sidney, of
Marmaduke Robinson, before a French Reign of Terror, and a Salem
hanging of witches, before a fanatic Revival, and the Animal
Magnetism in Paris, or in Providence. We assume that we under
like influence should be alike affected, and should achieve the
like; and we aim to master intellectually the steps, and reach
the same height or the same degradation, that our fellow, our
proxy, has done.
All inquiry into antiquity, -- all curiosity respecting the
Pyramids, the excavated cities, Stonehenge, the Ohio Circles,
Mexico, Memphis, -- is the desire to do away this wild, savage,
and preposterous There or Then, and introduce in its place the
Here and the Now. Belzoni digs and measures in the mummy-pits and
pyramids of Thebes, until he can see the end of the difference
between the monstrous work and himself. When he has satisfied
himself, in general and in detail, that it was made by such a
person as he, so armed and so motived, and to ends to which he
himself should also have worked, the problem is solved; his
thought lives along the whole line of temples and sphinxes and
catacombs, passes through them all with satisfaction, and they
live again to the mind, or are now.
A Gothic cathedral affirms that it was done by us, and not
done by us. Surely it was by man, but we find it not in our man.
But we apply ourselves to the history of its production. We put
ourselves into the place and state of the builder. We remember
the forest-dwellers, the first temples, the adherence to the
first type, and the decoration of it as the wealth of the nation
increased; the value which is given to wood by carving led to the
carving over the whole mountain of stone of a cathedral. When we
have gone through this process, and added thereto the Catholic
Church, its cross, its music, its processions, its Saints' days
and image-worship, we have, as it were, been the man that made
the minster; we have seen how it could and must be. We have the
sufficient reason.
The difference between men is in their principle of
association. Some men classify objects by color and size and
other accidents of appearance; others by intrinsic likeness, or
by the relation of cause and effect. The progress of the
intellect is to the clearer vision of causes, which neglects
surface differences. To the poet, to the philosopher, to the
saint, all things are friendly and sacred, all events profitable,
all days holy, all men divine. For the eye is fastened on the
life, and slights the circumstance. Every chemical substance,
every plant, every animal in its growth, teaches the unity of
cause, the variety of appearance.
Upborne and surrounded as we are by this all-creating nature,
soft and fluid as a cloud or the air, why should we be such hard
pedants, and magnify a few forms? Why should we make account of
time, or of magnitude, or of figure? The soul knows them not, and
genius, obeying its law, knows how to play with them as a young
child plays with graybeards and in churches. Genius studies the
causal thought, and, far back in the womb of things, sees the
rays parting from one orb, that diverge ere they fall by infinite
diameters. Genius watches the monad through all his masks as he
performs the metempsychosis of nature. Genius detects through the
fly, through the caterpillar, through the grub, through the egg,
the constant individual; through countless individuals, the fixed
species; through many species, the genus; through all genera, the
steadfast type; through all the kingdoms of organized life, the
eternal unity. Nature is a mutable cloud, which is always and
never the same. She casts the same thought into troops of forms,
as a poet makes twenty fables with one moral. Through the
bruteness and toughness of matter, a subtle spirit bends all
things to its own will. The adamant streams into soft but precise
form before it, and, whilst I look at it, its outline and texture
are changed again. Nothing is so fleeting as form; yet never does
it quite deny itself. In man we still trace the remains or hints
of all that we esteem badges of servitude in the lower races; yet
in him they enhance his nobleness and grace; as Io, in Aeschylus,
transformed to a cow, offends the imagination; but how changed,
when as Isis in Egypt she meets Osiris-Jove, a beautiful woman,
with nothing of the metamorphosis left but the lunar horns as the
splendid ornament of her brows!
The identity of history is equally intrinsic, the diversity
equally obvious. There is at the surface infinite variety of
things; at the centre there is simplicity of cause. How many are
the acts of one man in which we recognize the same character!
Observe the sources of our information in respect to the Greek
genius. We have the civil history of that people, as Herodotus,
Thucydides, Xenophon, and Plutarch have given it; a very
sufficient account of what manner of persons they were, and what
they did. We have the same national mind expressed for us again
in their literature, in epic and lyric poems, drama, and
philosophy; a very complete form. Then we have it once more in
their architecture, a beauty as of temperance itself, limited
to the straight line and the square, -- a builded geometry. Then
we have it once again in sculpture, the "tongue on the balance
of expression," a multitude of forms in the utmost freedom of
action, and never transgressing the ideal serenity; like votaries
performing some religious dance before the gods, and, though in
convulsive pain or mortal combat, never daring to break the
figure and decorum of their dance. Thus, of the genius of one
remarkable people, we have a fourfold representation: and to the
senses what more unlike than an ode of Pindar, a marble centaur,
the peristyle of the Parthenon, and the last actions of
Phocion?
Every one must have observed faces and forms which, without
any resembling feature, make a like impression on the beholder. A
particular picture or copy of verses, if it do not awaken the
same train of images, will yet superinduce the same sentiment as
some wild mountain walk, although the resemblance is nowise
obvious to the senses, but is occult and out of the reach of the
understanding. Nature is an endless combination and repetition of
a very few laws. She hums the old well-known air through
innumerable variations.
Nature is full of a sublime family likeness throughout her
works; and delights in startling us with resemblances in the most
unexpected quarters. I have seen the head of an old sachem of the
forest, which at once reminded the eye of a bald mountain summit,
and the furrows of the brow suggested the strata of the rock.
There are men whose manners have the same essential splendor as
the simple and awful sculpture on the friezes of the Parthenon,
and the remains of the earliest Greek art. And there are
compositions of the same strain to be found in the books of all
ages. What is Guido's Rospigliosi Aurora but a morning thought,
as the horses in it are only a morning cloud. If any one will but
take pains to observe the variety of actions to which he is
equally inclined in certain moods of mind, and those to which he
is averse, he will see how deep is the chain of affinity.
A painter told me that nobody could draw a tree without in
some sort becoming a tree; or draw a child by studying the
outlines of its form merely, -- but, by watching for a time his
motions and plays, the painter enters into his nature, and can
then draw him at will in every attitude. So Roos "entered into
the inmost nature of a sheep." I knew a draughtsman employed in a
public survey, who found that he could not sketch the rocks until
their geological structure was first explained to him. In a
certain state of thought is the common origin of very diverse
works. It is the spirit and not the fact that is identical. By a
deeper apprehension, and not primarily by a painful acquisition
of many manual skills, the artist attains the power of awakening
other souls to a given activity.
It has been said, that "common souls pay with what they do;
nobler souls with that which they are." And why? Because a
profound nature awakens in us by its actions and words, by its
very looks and manners, the same power and beauty that a gallery
of sculpture, or of pictures, addresses.
Civil and natural history, the history of art and of
literature, must be explained from individual history, or must
remain words. There is nothing but is related to us, nothing that
does not interest us, -- kingdom, college, tree, horse, or iron
shoe, the roots of all things are in man. Santa Croce and the
Dome of St. Peter's are lame copies after a divine model.
Strasburg Cathedral is a material counterpart of the soul of
Erwin of Steinbach. The true poem is the poet's mind; the true
ship is the ship-builder. In the man, could we lay him open, we
should see the reason for the last flourish and tendril of his
work; as every spine and tint in the sea-shell preexist in the
secreting organs of the fish. The whole of heraldry and of
chivalry is in courtesy. A man of fine manners shall pronounce
your name with all the ornament that titles of nobility could
ever add.
The trivial experience of every day is always verifying some
old prediction to us, and converting into things the words and
signs which we had heard and seen without heed. A lady, with whom
I was riding in the forest, said to me, that the woods always
seemed to her to wait, as if the genii who inhabit them
suspended their deeds until the wayfarer has passed onward: a
thought which poetry has celebrated in the dance of the fairies,
which breaks off on the approach of human feet. The man who has
seen the rising moon break out of the clouds at midnight has been
present like an archangel at the creation of light and of the
world. I remember one summer day, in the fields, my companion
pointed out to me a broad cloud, which might extend a quarter of
a mile parallel to the horizon, quite accurately in the form of a
cherub as painted over churches, -- a round block in the centre,
which it was easy to animate with eyes and mouth, supported on
either side by wide-stretched symmetrical wings. What appears
once in the atmosphere may appear often, and it was undoubtedly
the archetype of that familiar ornament. I have seen in the sky a
chain of summer lightning which at once showed to me that the
Greeks drew from nature when they painted the thunderbolt in the
hand of Jove. I have seen a snow-drift along the sides of the
stone wall which obviously gave the idea of the common
architectural scroll to abut a tower.
By surrounding ourselves with the original circumstances, we
invent anew the orders and the ornaments of architecture, as we
see how each people merely decorated its primitive abodes. The
Doric temple preserves the semblance of the wooden cabin in which
the Dorian dwelt. The Chinese pagoda is plainly a Tartar tent.
The Indian and Egyptian temples still betray the mounds and
subterranean houses of their forefathers. "The custom of making
houses and tombs in the living rock," says Heeren, in his
Researches on the Ethiopians, "determined very naturally the
principal character of the Nubian Egyptian architecture to the
colossal form which it assumed. In these caverns, already
prepared by nature, the eye was accustomed to dwell on huge
shapes and masses, so that, when art came to the assistance of
nature, it could not move on a small scale without degrading
itself. What would statues of the usual size, or neat porches and
wings, have been, associated with those gigantic halls before
which only Colossi could sit as watchmen, or lean on the pillars
of the interior?"
The Gothic church plainly originated in a rude adaptation of
the forest trees with all their boughs to a festal or solemn
arcade, as the bands about the cleft pillars still indicate the
green withes that tied them. No one can walk in a road cut
through pine woods, without being struck with the architectural
appearance of the grove, especially in winter, when the bareness
of all other trees shows the low arch of the Saxons. In the woods
in a winter afternoon one will see as readily the origin of the
stained glass window, with which the Gothic cathedrals are
adorned, in the colors of the western sky seen through the bare
and crossing branches of the forest. Nor can any lover of nature
enter the old piles of Oxford and the English cathedrals, without
feeling that the forest overpowered the mind of the builder, and
that his chisel, his saw, and plane still reproduced its ferns,
its spikes of flowers, its locust, elm, oak, pine, fir, and
spruce.
The Gothic cathedral is a blossoming in stone subdued by the
insatiable demand of harmony in man. The mountain of granite
blooms into an eternal flower, with the lightness and delicate
finish, as well as the aerial proportions and perspective, of
vegetable beauty.
In like manner, all public facts are to be individualized, all
private facts are to be generalized. Then at once History becomes
fluid and true, and Biography deep and sublime. As the Persian
imitated in the slender shafts and capitals of his architecture
the stem and flower of the lotus and palm, so the Persian court
in its magnificent era never gave over the nomadism of its
barbarous tribes, but travelled from Ecbatana, where the spring
was spent, to Susa in summer, and to Babylon for the winter.
In the early history of Asia and Africa, Nomadism and
Agriculture are the two antagonist facts. The geography of Asia
and of Africa necessitated a nomadic life. But the nomads were
the terror of all those whom the soil, or the advantages of a
market, had induced to build towns. Agriculture, therefore, was a
religious injunction, because of the perils of the state from
nomadism. And in these late and civil countries of England and
America, these propensities still fight out the old battle in the
nation and in the individual. The nomads of Africa were
constrained to wander by the attacks of the gad-fly, which drives
the cattle mad, and so compels the tribe to emigrate in the rainy
season, and to drive off the cattle to the higher sandy regions.
The nomads of Asia follow the pasturage from month to month. In
America and Europe, the nomadism is of trade and curiosity; a
progress, certainly, from the gad-fly of Astaboras to the Anglo
and Italo-mania of Boston Bay. Sacred cities, to which a
periodical religious pilgrimage was enjoined, or stringent laws
and customs, tending to invigorate the national bond, were the
check on the old rovers; and the cumulative values of long
residence are the restraints on the itineracy of the present day.
The antagonism of the two tendencies is not less active in
individuals, as the love of adventure or the love of repose
happens to predominate. A man of rude health and flowing spirits
has the faculty of rapid domestication, lives in his wagon, and
roams through all latitudes as easily as a Calmuc. At sea, or in
the forest, or in the snow, he sleeps as warm, dines with as good
appetite, and associates as happily, as beside his own chimneys.
Or perhaps his facility is deeper seated, in the increased range
of his faculties of observation, which yield him points of
interest wherever fresh objects meet his eyes. The pastoral
nations were needy and hungry to desperation; and this
intellectual nomadism, in its excess, bankrupts the mind, through
the dissipation of power on a miscellany of objects. The
home-keeping wit, on the other hand, is that continence or
content which finds all the elements of life in its own soil; and
which has its own perils of monotony and deterioration, if not
stimulated by foreign infusions.
Every thing the individual sees without him corresponds to his
states of mind, and every thing is in turn intelligible to him,
as his onward thinking leads him into the truth to which that
fact or series belongs.
The primeval world, -- the Fore-World, as the Germans say, --
I can dive to it in myself as well as grope for it with
researching fingers in catacombs, libraries, and the broken
reliefs and torsos of ruined villas.
What is the foundation of that interest all men feel in Greek
history, letters, art, and poetry, in all its periods, from the
Heroic or Homeric age down to the domestic life of the Athenians
and Spartans, four or five centuries later? What but this, that
every man passes personally through a Grecian period. The Grecian
state is the era of the bodily nature, the perfection of the
senses, -- of the spiritual nature unfolded in strict unity with
the body. In it existed those human forms which supplied the
sculptor with his models of Hercules, Phoebus, and Jove; not
like the forms abounding in the streets of modern cities, wherein
the face is a confused blur of features, but composed of
incorrupt, sharply defined, and symmetrical features, whose
eye-sockets are so formed that it would be impossible for such
eyes to squint, and take furtive glances on this side and on
that, but they must turn the whole head. The manners of that
period are plain and fierce. The reverence exhibited is for
personal qualities, courage, address, self-command, justice,
strength, swiftness, a loud voice, a broad chest. Luxury and
elegance are not known. A sparse population and want make every
man his own valet, cook, butcher, and soldier, and the habit of
supplying his own needs educates the body to wonderful
performances. Such are the Agamemnon and Diomed of Homer, and not
far different is the picture Xenophon gives of himself and his
compatriots in the Retreat of the Ten Thousand. "After the army
had crossed the river Teleboas in Armenia, there fell much snow,
and the troops lay miserably on the ground covered with it. But
Xenophon arose naked, and, taking an axe, began to split wood;
whereupon others rose and did the like." Throughout his army
exists a boundless liberty of speech. They quarrel for plunder,
they wrangle with the generals on each new order, and Xenophon is
as sharp-tongued as any, and sharper-tongued than most, and so
gives as good as he gets. Who does not see that this is a gang of
great boys, with such a code of honor and such lax discipline as
great boys have?
The costly charm of the ancient tragedy, and indeed of all the
old literature, is, that the persons speak simply, -- speak as
persons who have great good sense without knowing it, before yet
the reflective habit has become the predominant habit of the
mind. Our admiration of the antique is not admiration of the old,
but of the natural. The Greeks are not reflective, but perfect in
their senses and in their health, with the finest physical
organization in the world. Adults acted with the simplicity and
grace of children. They made vases, tragedies, and statues, such
as healthy senses should,---- that is, in good taste. Such things
have continued to be made in all ages, and are now, wherever a
healthy physique exists; but, as a class, from their superior
organization, they have surpassed all. They combine the energy of
manhood with the engaging unconsciousness of childhood. The
attraction of these manners is that they belong to man, and are
known to every man in virtue of his being once a child; besides
that there are always individuals who retain these
characteristics. A person of childlike genius and inborn energy
is still a Greek, and revives our love of the Muse of Hellas. I
admire the love of nature in the Philoctetes. In reading those
fine apostrophes to sleep, to the stars, rocks, mountains, and
waves, I feel time passing away as an ebbing sea. I feel the
eternity of man, the identity of his thought. The Greek had, it
seems, the same fellow-beings as I. The sun and moon, water and
fire, met his heart precisely as they meet mine. Then the vaunted
distinction between Greek and English, between Classic and
Romantic schools, seems superficial and pedantic. When a thought
of Plato becomes a thought to me, -- when a truth that fired the
soul of Pindar fires mine, time is no more. When I feel that we
two meet in a perception, that our two souls are tinged with the
same hue, and do, as it were, run into one, why should I measure
degrees of latitude, why should I count Egyptian years?
The student interprets the age of chivalry by his own age of
chivalry, and the days of maritime adventure and circumnavigation
by quite parallel miniature experiences of his own. To the sacred
history of the world, he has the same key. When the voice of a
prophet out of the deeps of antiquity merely echoes to him a
sentiment of his infancy, a prayer of his youth, he then pierces
to the truth through all the confusion of tradition and the
caricature of institutions.
Rare, extravagant spirits come by us at intervals, who
disclose to us new facts in nature. I see that men of God have,
from time to time, walked among men and made their commission
felt in the heart and soul of the commonest hearer. Hence,
evidently, the tripod, the priest, the priestess inspired by the
divine afflatus.
Jesus astonishes and overpowers sensual people. They cannot
unite him to history, or reconcile him with themselves. As they
come to revere their intuitions and aspire to live holily, their
own piety explains every fact, every word.
How easily these old worships of Moses, of Zoroaster, of Menu,
of Socrates, domesticate themselves in the mind. I cannot find
any antiquity in them. They are mine as much as theirs.
I have seen the first monks and anchorets without crossing
seas or centuries. More than once some individual has appeared to
me with such negligence of labor and such commanding
contemplation, a haughty beneficiary, begging in the name of God,
as made good to the nineteenth century Simeon the Stylite, the
Thebais, and the first Capuchins.
The priestcraft of the East and West, of the Magian, Brahmin,
Druid, and Inca, is expounded in the individual's private life.
The cramping influence of a hard formalist on a young child in
repressing his spirits and courage, paralyzing the understanding,
and that without producing indignation, but only fear and
obedience, and even much sympathy with the tyranny, -- is a
familiar fact explained to the child when he becomes a man, only
by seeing that the oppressor of his youth is himself a child
tyrannized over by those names and words and forms, of whose
influence he was merely the organ to the youth. The fact teaches
him how Belus was worshipped, and how the Pyramids were built,
better than the discovery by Champollion of the names of all the
workmen and the cost of every tile. He finds Assyria and the
Mounds of Cholula at his door, and himself has laid the
courses.
Again, in that protest which each considerate person makes
against the superstition of his times, he repeats step for step
the part of old reformers, and in the search after truth finds
like them new perils to virtue. He learns again what moral vigor
is needed to supply the girdle of a superstition. A great
licentiousness treads on the heels of a reformation. How many
times in the history of the world has the Luther of the day had
to lament the decay of piety in his own household! "Doctor," said
his wife to Martin Luther, one day, "how is it that, whilst
subject to papacy, we prayed so often and with such fervor,
whilst now we pray with the utmost coldness and very seldom?"
The advancing man discovers how deep a property he has in
literature, -- in all fable as well as in all history. He finds
that the poet was no odd fellow who described strange and
impossible situations, but that universal man wrote by his pen a
confession true for one and true for all. His own secret
biography he finds in lines wonderfully intelligible to him,
dotted down before he was born. One after another he comes up in
his private adventures with every fable of Aesop, of Homer, of
Hafiz, of Ariosto, of Chaucer, of Scott, and verifies them with
his own head and hands.
The beautiful fables of the Greeks, being proper creations of
the imagination and not of the fancy, are universal verities.
What a range of meanings and what perpetual pertinence has the
story of Prometheus! Beside its primary value as the first
chapter of the history of Europe, (the mythology thinly veiling
authentic facts, the invention of the mechanic arts, and the
migration of colonies,) it gives the history of religion with
some closeness to the faith of later ages. Prometheus is the
Jesus of the old mythology. He is the friend of man; stands
between the unjust "justice" of the Eternal Father and the race
of mortals, and readily suffers all things on their account. But
where it departs from the Calvinistic Christianity, and exhibits
him as the defier of Jove, it represents a state of mind which
readily appears wherever the doctrine of Theism is taught in a
crude, objective form, and which seems the self-defence of man
against this untruth, namely, a discontent with the believed fact
that a God exists, and a feeling that the obligation of reverence
is onerous. It would steal, if it could, the fire of the Creator,
and live apart from him, and independent of him. The Prometheus
Vinctus is the romance of skepticism. Not less true to all time
are the details of that stately apologue. Apollo kept the flocks
of Admetus, said the poets. When the gods come among men, they
are not known. Jesus was not; Socrates and Shakspeare were not.
Antaeus was suffocated by the gripe of Hercules, but every time
he touched his mother earth, his strength was renewed. Man is the
broken giant, and, in all his weakness, both his body and his
mind are invigorated by habits of conversation with nature. The
power of music, the power of poetry to unfix, and, as it were,
clap wings to solid nature, interprets the riddle of Orpheus. The
philosophical perception of identity through endless mutations of
form makes him know the Proteus. What else am I who laughed or
wept yesterday, who slept last night like a corpse, and this
morning stood and ran? And what see I on any side but the
transmigrations of Proteus? I can symbolize my thought by using
the name of any creature, of any fact, because every creature is
man agent or patient. Tantalus is but a name for you and me.
Tantalus means the impossibility of drinking the waters of
thought which are always gleaming and waving within sight of the
soul. The transmigration of souls is no fable. I would it were;
but men and women are only half human. Every animal of the
barn-yard, the field, and the forest, of the earth and of the
waters that are under the earth, has contrived to get a footing
and to leave the print of its features and form in some one or
other of these upright, heaven-facing speakers. Ah! brother, stop
the ebb of thy soul, -- ebbing downward into the forms into whose
habits thou hast now for many years slid. As near and proper to
us is also that old fable of the Sphinx, who was said to sit in
the road-side and put riddles to every passenger. If the man
could not answer, she swallowed him alive. If he could solve the
riddle, the Sphinx was slain. What is our life but an endless
flight of winged facts or events! In splendid variety these
changes come, all putting questions to the human spirit. Those
men who cannot answer by a superior wisdom these facts or
questions of time, serve them. Facts encumber them, tyrannize
over them, and make the men of routine the men of sense, in
whom a literal obedience to facts has extinguished every spark of
that light by which man is truly man. But if the man is true to
his better instincts or sentiments, and refuses the dominion of
facts, as one that comes of a higher race, remains fast by the
soul and sees the principle, then the facts fall aptly and supple
into their places; they know their master, and the meanest of
them glorifies him.
See in Goethe's Helena the same desire that every word should
be a thing. These figures, he would say, these Chirons, Griffins,
Phorkyas, Helen, and Leda, are somewhat, and do exert a specific
influence on the mind. So far then are they eternal entities, as
real to-day as in the first Olympiad. Much revolving them, he
writes out freely his humor, and gives them body tohis own
imagination. And although that poem be as vague and fantastic as
a dream, yet is it much more attractive than the more regular
dramatic pieces of the same author, for the reason that it
operates a wonderful relief to the mind from the routine of
customary images, -- awakens the reader's invention and fancy by
the wild freedom of the design, and by the unceasing succession
of brisk shocks of surprise.
The universal nature, too strong for the petty nature of the
bard, sits on his neck and writes through his hand; so that when
he seems to vent a mere caprice and wild romance, the issue is an
exact allegory. Hence Plato said that "poets utter great and wise
things which they do not themselves understand." All the fictions
of the Middle Age explain themselves as a masked or frolic
expression of that which in grave earnest the mind of that period
toiled to achieve. Magic, and all that is ascribed to it, is a
deep presentiment of the powers of science. The shoes of
swiftness, the sword of sharpness, the power of subduing the
elements, of using the secret virtues of minerals, of
understanding the voices of birds, are the obscure efforts of the
mind in a right direction. The preternatural prowess of the hero,
the gift of perpetual youth, and the like, are alike the
endeavour of the human spirit "to bend the shows of things to the
desires of the mind."
In Perceforest and Amadis de Gaul, a garland and a rose bloom
on the head of her who is faithful, and fade on the brow of the
inconstant. In the story of the Boy and the Mantle, even a mature
reader may be surprised with a glow of virtuous pleasure at the
triumph of the gentle Genelas; and, indeed, all the postulates of
elfin annals, -- that the fairies do not like to be named; that
their gifts are capricious and not to be trusted; that who seeks
a treasure must not speak; and the like, -- I find true in
Concord, however they might be in Cornwall or Bretagne.
Is it otherwise in the newest romance? I read the Bride of
Lammermoor. Sir William Ashton is a mask for a vulgar temptation,
Ravenswood Castle a fine name for proud poverty, and the foreign
mission of state only a Bunyan disguise for honest industry. We
may all shoot a wild bull that would toss the good and beautiful,
by fighting down the unjust and sensual. Lucy Ashton is another
name for fidelity, which is always beautiful and always liable to
calamity in this world.
But along with the civil and metaphysical history of man,
another history goes daily forward, -- that of the external
world, -- in which he is not less strictly implicated. He is the
compend of time; he is also the correlative of nature. His power
consists in the multitude of his affinities, in the fact that his
life is intertwined with the whole chain of organic and inorganic
being. In old Rome the public roads beginning at the Forum
proceeded north, south, east, west, to the centre of every
province of the empire, making each market-town of Persia, Spain,
and Britain pervious to the soldiers of the capital: so out of
the human heart go, as it were, highways to the heart of every
object in nature, to reduce it under the dominion of man. A man
is a bundle of relations, a knot of roots, whose flower and
fruitage is the world. His faculties refer to natures out of him,
and predict the world he is to inhabit, as the fins of the fish
foreshow that water exists, or the wings of an eagle in the egg
presuppose air. He cannot live without a world. Put Napoleon in
an island prison, let his faculties find no men to act on, no
Alps to climb, no stake to play for, and he would beat the air
and appear stupid. Transport him to large countries, dense
population, complex interests, and antagonist power, and you
shall see that the man Napoleon, bounded, that is, by such a
profile and outline, is not the virtual Napoleon.
This is but
Talbot's shadow;
"His substance is not here:
For what you see is but the smallest part
And least proportion of humanity;
But were the whole frame here,
It is of such a spacious, lofty pitch,
Your roof were not sufficient to contain it."
Henry VI
Columbus needs a planet to shape his course upon. Newton and
Laplace need myriads of ages and thick-strewn celestial areas.
One may say a gravitating solar system is already prophesied in
the nature of Newton's mind. Not less does the brain of Davy or
of Gay-Lussac, from childhood exploring the affinities and
repulsions of particles, anticipate the laws of organization.
Does not the eye of the human embryo predict the light? the ear
of Handel predict the witchcraft of harmonic sound? Do not the
constructive fingers of Watt, Fulton, Whittemore, Arkwright,
predict the fusible, hard, and temperable texture of metals, the
properties of stone, water, and wood? Do not the lovely
attributes of the maiden child predict the refinements and
decorations of civil society? Here also we are reminded of the
action of man on man. A mind might ponder its thought for ages,
and not gain so much self-knowledge as the passion of love shall
teach it in a day. Who knows himself before he has been thrilled
with indignation at an outrage, or has heard an eloquent tongue,
or has shared the throb of thousands in a national exultation or
alarm? No man can antedate his experience, or guess what faculty
or feeling a new object shall unlock, any more than he can draw
to-day the face of a person whom he shall see to-morrow for the
first time.
I will not now go behind the general statement to explore the
reason of this correspondency. Let it suffice that in the light
of these two facts, namely, that the mind is One, and that nature
is its correlative, history is to be read and written.
Thus in all ways does the soul concentrate and reproduce its
treasures for each pupil. He, too, shall pass through the whole
cycle of experience. He shall collect into a focus the rays of
nature. History no longer shall be a dull book. It shall walk
incarnate in every just and wise man. You shall not tell me by
languages and titles a catalogue of the volumes you have read.
You shall make me feel what periods you have lived. A man shall
be the Temple of Fame. He shall walk, as the poets have described
that goddess, in a robe painted all over with wonderful events
and experiences; -- his own form and features by their exalted
intelligence shall be that variegated vest. I shall find in him
the Foreworld; in his childhood the Age of Gold; the Apples of
Knowledge; the Argonautic Expedition; the calling of Abraham; the
building of the Temple; the Advent of Christ; Dark Ages; the
Revival of Letters; the Reformation; the discovery of new lands;
the opening of new sciences, and new regions in man. He shall be
the priest of Pan, and bring with him into humble cottages the
blessing of the morning stars and all the recorded benefits of
heaven and earth.
Is there somewhat overweening in this claim? Then I reject all
I have written, for what is the use of pretending to know what we
know not? But it is the fault of our rhetoric that we cannot
strongly state one fact without seeming to belie some other. I
hold our actual knowledge very cheap. Hear the rats in the wall,
see the lizard on the fence, the fungus under foot, the lichen on
the log. What do I know sympathetically, morally, of either of
these worlds of life? As old as the Caucasian man, -- perhaps
older, -- these creatures have kept their counsel beside him, and
there is no record of any word or sign that has passed from one
to the other. What connection do the books show between the fifty
or sixty chemical elements, and the historical eras? Nay, what
does history yet record of the metaphysical annals of man? What
light does it shed on those mysteries which we hide under the
names Death and Immortality? Yet every history should be written
in a wisdom which divined the range of our affinities and looked
at facts as symbols. I am ashamed to see what a shallow village
tale our so-called History is. How many times we must say Rome,
and Paris, and Constantinople! What does Rome know of rat and
lizard? What are Olympiads and Consulates to these neighbouring
systems of being? Nay, what food or experience or succour have
they for the Esquimaux seal-hunter, for the Kanaka in his canoe,
for the fisherman, the stevedore, the porter?
Broader and deeper we must write our annals, -- from an
ethical reformation, from an influx of the ever new, ever
sanative conscience, -- if we would trulier express our central
and wide-related nature, instead of this old chronology of
selfishness and pride to which we have too long lent our eyes.
Already that day exists for us, shines in on us at unawares, but
the path of science and of letters is not the way into nature.
The idiot, the Indian, the child, and unschooled farmer's boy,
stand nearer to the light by which nature is to be read, than the
dissector or the antiquary.
RALPH WALDO EMERSON (1803-1882) was, in his time, the leading voice of intellectual culture in the United States. He remains widely influential
to this day through his essays, lectures, poems, and philosophical writings.
In the later eighteen-twenties Ralph Waldo Emerson read, and was very significantly influenced by, a work by a French philosopher named Victor Cousin.
A key section of Cousin's work reads as follows:
"What is the business of history? What is the stuff of which it is made? Who is the personage of history? Man : evidently man and human nature.
There are many different elements in history. What are they? Evidently again, the elements of human nature. History is therefore the development of humanity,
and of humanity only; for nothing else but humanity develops itself, for nothing else than humanity is free. …
… Moreover, when we have all the elements, I mean all the essential elements, their mutual relations do, as it were, discover themselves. We draw from the
nature of these different elements, if not all their possible relations, at least their general and fundamental relations."
Introduction to the History of Philosophy (1829)
Even before he had first read Cousin, (in 1829), Emerson had expressed views in his private Journals which suggest that he accepted that Human Nature, and Human Beings, tend to display three identifiable aspects and orientations:
Imagine hope to be removed from the human breast & see how Society will sink, how the strong bands of order & improvement will be relaxed & what a deathlike stillness would take the place of the restless energies that now move the world. The scholar will extinguish his midnight lamp, the merchant will furl his white sails & bid them seek the deep no more. The anxious patriot who stood out for his country to the last & devised in the last beleagured citadel, profound schemes for its deliverance and aggrandizement, will sheathe his sword and blot his fame. Remove hope, & the world becomes a blank and rottenness.
(Journal entry made between October and December, 1823)
In all districts of all lands, in all the classes of communities thousands of minds are intently occupied, the merchant in his compting house, the mechanist over his plans, the statesman at his map, his treaty, & his tariff, the scholar in the skilful history & eloquence of antiquity, each stung to the quick with the desire of exalting himself to a hasty & yet unfound height above the level of his peers. Each is absorbed in the prospect of good accruing to himself but each is no less contributing to the utmost of his ability to fix & adorn human civilization.
(Journal entry of December, 1824)
Our neighbours are occupied with employments of infinite diversity. Some are intent on commercial speculations; some engage warmly in political contention; some are found all day long at their books …
(This dates from January - February, 1828)
The quotes from emerson are reminiscent of a line from another "leading voice of intellectual culture" - William Shakespeare.
There's neither honesty, manhood, nor good fellowship in thee.
William Shakespeare: Henry IV (Pt 1), Act I, Scene II
Is Human Being more truly Metaphysical than Physical?
Where this could, possibly, lead ...
N. B. The page mentioned in the graphic ~ roots.asp ~
has been replaced by this page
Popular European History pages
at Age-of-the-Sage
The preparation of these "European History" pages was influenced to some degree by a particular "Philosophy
of History" as suggested by this quote from the famous Essay "History" by Ralph Waldo Emerson:-
There is one mind common to all individual men...
Of the works of this mind history is the record. Its genius is
illustrated by the entire series of days. Man is explicable by
nothing less than all his history. Without hurry, without rest,
the human spirit goes forth from the beginning to embody every
faculty, every thought, every emotion, which belongs to it in
appropriate events. But the thought is always prior to the fact;
all the facts of history preexist in the mind as laws. Each law
in turn is made by circumstances predominant, and the limits of
nature give power to but one at a time. A man is the whole
encyclopaedia of facts. The creation of a thousand forests is in
one acorn, and Egypt, Greece, Rome, Gaul, Britain, America, lie
folded already in the first man. Epoch after epoch, camp,
kingdom, empire, republic, democracy, are merely the application
of his manifold spirit to the manifold world.